Privy Council Review of intercept as evidence

Privy Council Review of intercept as evidence
Author :
Publisher : The Stationery Office
Total Pages : 76
Release :
ISBN-10 : 0101732422
ISBN-13 : 9780101732420
Rating : 4/5 (22 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Privy Council Review of intercept as evidence by : John Sir Chilcot

Download or read book Privy Council Review of intercept as evidence written by John Sir Chilcot and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2008-02-06 with total page 76 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The creation of this Privy Council Review was announced on 25 July 2007 "to advise on whether a regime to allow the use of intercepted material in court can be devised that facilitates bringing cases to trial while meeting the overriding imperative to safeguard national security". All bodies and individuals that met with or provided evidence to the Review were in favour in principle of intercept as evidence. But there were very different views as to whether national security could be safeguarded effectively. The Review endorses the principles that: there is an overriding imperative to safeguard national security; all trials must be (and be seen to be) procedurally fair; the State should wherever possible prosecute those it believes are involved in terrorism or other serious crimes; in any criminal prosecution the best available evidence should be made available in court. The report examines: current use of intercept; potential use and benefit of intercept as evidence; risks; resource implications; new communications technology; relevance of experiences of other countries; legal models. The Review concludes that intercept as evidence should be introduced. It believes that it would be possible to provide for the use of intercept as evidence in criminal trials in England and Wales by developing a robust legal model, based in statute and compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. A model - PII Plus (PII = Public Interest Immunity) - is suggested as the basis, and the Review outlines further preparatory work and confidence-building measures necessary to develop a detailed regime.


Privy Council Review of intercept as evidence Related Books

Privy Council Review of intercept as evidence
Language: en
Pages: 76
Authors: John Sir Chilcot
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2008-02-06 - Publisher: The Stationery Office

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The creation of this Privy Council Review was announced on 25 July 2007 "to advise on whether a regime to allow the use of intercepted material in court can be
Intelligence and Security Committee annual report 2008-2009
Language: en
Pages: 60
Authors: Great Britain: Intelligence and Security Committee
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2010-03-11 - Publisher: The Stationery Office

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This report details the work of the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) for the period December 2008 to July 2009. The majority of the Committee's time du
Critical Perspectives on Counter-terrorism
Language: en
Pages: 234
Authors: Lee Jarvis
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2014-12-17 - Publisher: Routledge

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This volume examines the rationale, effectiveness and consequences of counter terrorism practices from a range of perspectives and cases. The book critically in
The Home Office's response to terrorist attacks
Language: en
Pages: 40
Authors: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Home Affairs Committee
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2010-02-02 - Publisher: The Stationery Office

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Calls for the merger of many different counter-terrorism committees into a single, formalised National Security Committee, chaired by the Home Secretary or Prim
Improperly Obtained Evidence in Anglo-American and Continental Law
Language: en
Pages: 349
Authors: Dimitrios Giannoulopoulos
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019-02-21 - Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This is the first book to offer an extensive cosmopolitan, cross-cultural insight into the perennial controversy over the use of improperly obtained evidence in